Microsoft admits patch didn't work

A forum for general news about the internet. Might not be strictly PC, should be connected in some way.

Moderators: JeanInMontana, rockingmtranch, ShadowPuterDude, admin, MysteryFCM, Owner

User avatar
rockingmtranch
I Have Powah
I Have Powah
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Meadowbrook, CA
Contact:

Microsoft admits patch didn't work

Postby rockingmtranch » Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:21 pm

Microsoft admits patch didn't work, encourages XP SP2, SP3 re-installs
Fix for 32-bit editions of XP, including the new Service Pack 3 (SP3), did not work
Gregg Keizer 20/06/2008

Microsoft asked for a patch do-over Thursday as it re-released one of last week's security updates after realizing the original fix didn't do the job.

"After we released MS08-030 we learned that the security updates for Windows XP SP2 and SP3 might not have been fully protecting against the issues discussed in that bulletin," Christopher Budd, a spokesman for the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), said in an e-mail. "As soon as we learned of that possibility, we mobilized our Software Security Incident Response Process (SSIRP) to investigate the issue."

MS08-030 debuted June 10 as part of a group of seven security updates that patched 10 vulnerabilities in Windows and other Microsoft software. Called out by several analysts last week as the most interesting fix of the bunch, MS08-030 was supposed to plug a hole in Windows' implementation of Bluetooth, the short-range wireless protocol.

The update was one of three pegged "critical," the highest threat ranking in Microsoft's four-step scoring system.

Although the patch offered last week for Windows Vista and the 64-bit versions of Windows XP did the trick, the fix for the 32-bit editions of XP, including the new Service Pack 3 (SP3), did not, said Budd. He also promised that Microsoft would find out how the non-patching patch made it through the company's testing.

Human error, he added, is the likely cause. "As part of our standard process, we're beginning an investigation into how this happened," Budd said in a short entry to the MSRC's blog today. "We're just starting this investigation, but early on, it appears that there may have been two separate human issues involved. When we're done with our investigation, we'll take steps to better prevent it in the future."

Microsoft has had to re-release patches before. It most recently went back to the drawing board in March, when it was forced to re-issue a flawed update that had caused some versions of its Excel spreadsheet to make math mistakes.

The revised MS08-030 bulletin stated that the new patch for Windows XP has been seeded to the usual Microsoft distribution channels, including Automatic Updates, Windows Update and Windows Server Update Services (WSUS).

http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.p ... 304;fpid;1
Linux. Don't fight it. You will be assimilated.
*******
Gulf War Vet--2nd Squadron, 2nd Armored Cavalry--Fort Polk, LA

User avatar
JeanInMontana
It's Mine!!
It's Mine!!
Posts: 3331
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:10 am
Location: South Central Montana
Contact:

Re: Microsoft admits patch didn't work

Postby JeanInMontana » Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:51 pm

Re-Release deemed critical... code critical... I still don't have SP3.
~Think Globally * Dream Universally~Anon
ImageImageImage Donating any amount helps keep this site alive.

User avatar
W3FSY
I Joined Up
I Joined Up
Posts: 469
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:56 am
Location: Eastern PA

Re: Microsoft admits patch didn't work

Postby W3FSY » Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:59 pm

Thanks for the heads up on KB 951376 WU, Mac. I saw at another forum that there was a new version issued after I saw the old yellow shield (hidden) had reappeared in my task bar. I did a system restore and deleted the old WU and installed the new update. It use to be just the 2nd Tuesday of the month that WU's were issued, but that is out the window anymore.

It is really getting hard keeping up with these WU's anymore. Seems there are problems with the updates every month anymore and if you leave WU's pile up - you may be in the dark not knowing if certain ones cause problems. I've gotten to the point that I create a restore point prior to installing any of them and do one update at a time and check to see if any problems exist after doing each one. It takes a while, but it is worth the time spent to install them.

Guess you don't get any MS WU's for your system though, Mac with using Linux or do you use Windows also? Linux is like understanding a new language and being able to speak it as well. I don't think I could understand the lingo. Tough enough understanding Windows.

:x:
RON – W3FSY
(General Class Amateur Radio Operator licensed since 1955.)

Dell Insp. 530 – Windows XP H.Ed. w/SP 3 - 320 Gb HD - 1 Gb RAM - IE 7
Online Armor 5.5.0.1616 (Free) Firewall – Avast! (Free) Antivirus v7.0.1466
MBAM v1.62.00.1300 – SUPERAntiSpyware (Free Ed.) v5.5.1012
SWB v4.6 – ATF Cleaner – Cyber Sent. v3.5.9.0 - FX v14.0.1 - BelArc Adv.

User avatar
rockingmtranch
I Have Powah
I Have Powah
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Meadowbrook, CA
Contact:

Re: Microsoft admits patch didn't work

Postby rockingmtranch » Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:23 pm

I happened on that notice on a Linux site Ron. I don't indulge in all that stuff :mrgreen: And you could understand it fine.
Linux. Don't fight it. You will be assimilated.
*******
Gulf War Vet--2nd Squadron, 2nd Armored Cavalry--Fort Polk, LA


Return to “Multi Media Musings”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests